Ear Kandy Radio

Ear Kandy Radio, the heartbeat of the streets

Coronavirus Predicted Back In 1981 By Dean Koontz

Did Dean Koontz really predict the Coronavirus back in 1981 when he released the book “The Eyes Of Darkness?”

The Eyes of Darkness is a thriller novel by American writer Dean Koontz, released in 1981. The book focuses on a mother who sets out on a quest to find out if her son truly did die one year ago, or if he is still alive.

Koontz never claimed to have predicted the coronavirus, but some of the similarities in his book really make you wonder. Take a look for yourself.

Based on snopes.com, they say it is “MOSTLY FALSE,” Dean Koontz did not predict the coronavirus. Here are a few reasons why they say this theory is false.

  • In Koontz’s novel, “Wuhan-400” is a human-made weapon. The coronavirus, on the other hand, was not. 
  • In the novel, “Wuhan-400” has a 100% fatality rate. While researchers are still learning about the coronavirus, the current fatality rate sits at about 2%. 
  • The fictional “Wuhan-400” has an extremely quick incubation period of about four hours, compared to COVID-19 which has an incubation period between two and 14 days. 
  • While the page from Koontz’s novel displayed above is genuine, other iterations of this book used a different name for the fictional biological weapon. In fact, when we searched a 1981 edition of this book available via Google Books we found no references to “Wuhan.” In that edition, this biological weapon is called “Gorki-400” after the Russian city where it was created.
  • We’re not entirely sure when or why this change occurred. From what we can tell, the biological weapon was originally called “Gorki-400” when this book was published in 1981. But by 2008, the name had been changed to “Wuhan-400.”
  • Regardless of when “Wuhan-400” made its way into Koontz’ novel, this is not a prediction. Koontz did not claim that the events that took place in his novel would later come to fruition, and the similarities between “Wuhan-400” and COVID-19 are minimal. Furthermore, readers only noticed this “prediction” after an outbreak of coronavirus was reported in Wuhan, China, which makes this “prediction” nothing more than a coincidence.

But IDK… Seems like more than a coincidence to me, but that is only my opinion!

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *