Ear Kandy Radio

Ear Kandy Radio, the heartbeat of the streets

The new remote work economy-Good and/or Bad

Working from home can be good and bad. The goal is to stay safe and remain productive. What are your thoughts?

One of the biggest changes brought on by the coronavirus pandemic has been the inundation of working from home — and it doesn’t come without challenges. A Stanford professor says working from home made employees 13% more productive and 50% less likely to quit. Other things to take into consideration are listed below.

Slump in productivity

For many, working from home has been a productivity disaster. (My 4-year-old regularly bursts into the room hoping to find me in a playful mood, shouting “doodoo!” in the middle of conference calls.)

The Ctrip analysis took into account that employees were only allowed to work from home if they had a home office. The room could not be a bedroom, and no one else was allowed into the room during the workday. Most of the people I’ve been interviewing are working in their bedrooms or shared common rooms, with noise from their partners, family or roommates.

A collapse in office-time will also lead to a slump in innovation. In-person collaboration is necessary.  Research has shown that face-to-face meetings are essential for developing new ideas and keeping staff motivated.

An explosion of mental health issues

Removing people from physical social interaction often leads to depression. After nine months of allowing employees to do their jobs at home, A company asked employees whether they wanted to keep working remotely, or return to the office. Half of them wanted to go back, despite their average commute being 40 minutes each way. The reason? Social company. Employees reported feeling isolated, lonely and depressed at home.

The rise of working from home presents similar phenomenon, though not as stark because, in retirement, you can at least engage more in outdoor activities with friends.

Not everyone can work remotely

In a recent study with the Atlanta Federal Reserve and the University of Chicago, only 65% of Americans reported having fast enough internet capacity to support workable video calls.

And 50% of respondents — mostly managers, professionals and financial workers who can carry out their jobs on computers — reported being able to work from home at an efficiency rate of 80% or more.

The others have such poor internet at home, or none at all, that it prevents effective telecommuting. Taken together, this is generating a time bomb for inequality. At the same time, those unable to work from home (either because of the nature of their jobs, or because they lack suitable space or internet connections) are being left behind. They face bleak prospects if their skills and work experience erode during an extended shutdown and beyond.

The bright side of a work-from-home economy

Despite the drawbacks, there are a few silver linings. This would lead to an increase in overall demand for office space in suburban industrial parks with low-rise buildings, as opposed to skyscrapers in big cities. If I were a company right now planning the future of my office, I’d be looking to the suburbs. Finally, investments in telecommuting technology have paid off significantly. By now, we’ve had plenty of experience working from home. We’ve become adept at video conferencing. In short, we’ve paid the startup costs for learning how to work from home, making it far easier to continue.

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *